Do Anti-Discrimination Laws Cover Interns and Volunteers?

Over 40 years ago, the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was enacted to abolish discrimination in several areas including voting rights, education, and employment. Title VII of this act addresses workplace discrimination. Under this portion of the Act, employees cannot be discriminated against for their race, color, religion, sex or national origin. While Title VII is fairly specific regarding what factors constitute discrimination, it is vague in its definition of who is considered an employee and is therefore protected by this part of the Act. Two types of individuals that are left in limbo by this vagueness are interns and volunteers.

A recent case concerning this situation is Bryson v. Middlefield Fire Department. Ms. Bryson alleged that she was a victim of sexual harassment while serving as a volunteer firefighter in Middlefield, Ohio. When she refused her supervisor’s sexual advances she was terminated. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) confirmed that she could file a suit claiming she was “sexually harassed and subjected to a sexually hostile work environment.” In response the fire department claimed Ms. Bryson was not covered under Title VII because she was a volunteer firefighter member — not an employee — and that the fire department was not an employer because it had less than 15 paid employees, a requirement to be considered an employer. The lower court ruled in favor of the fire department and Ms. Bryson took her case to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which hears cases for Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio and Tennessee.

The Sixth Circuit disagreed with the lower court’s decision and reversed it. Basing their decision on two U.S. Supreme Court cases, the judges ruled that more than just pay needs to be considered when determining if an entity is an employer and an individual is an employee. According to the Sixth Circuit, Bryson “put forth evidence that the firefighter-members received worker's compensation coverage, insurance coverage, gift cards, personal use of the Department's facilities and assets, training, and access to an emergency fund…and that, for particular portions of the relevant time period, certain firefighter-members received a one-time, lump-sum retirement payment and others received an hourly wage.” So even though the volunteer firefighters may not receive regular paychecks, they are compensated in other ways, making them employees, and consequently making the fire department an employer. In October, 2011, Ms. Bryson’s case was remanded back to the district court which must now decide whether or not the sexual harassment, retaliation and wrongful termination occurred.

Another case regarding an individual seeking protection under Title VII who did not receive regular wages involves someone who did not receive any compensation at all. In 2006, Dr. Syed Rafi filed an age discrimination lawsuit when he was denied volunteer positions at the National Human Genome Research Institute and the National Institutes of Health. While Dr. Rafi would not have been compensated in any way for the duration of the volunteer position, he showed that almost 10 percent of volunteers were offered full-time employment. The court ruled that this “clear pathway to employment” qualified as compensation. This decision made Rafi a potential employee of these institutes and allowed him to pursue his age discrimination claim.

In both cases, the individuals were not receiving actual regular paychecks from any company, and both were considered volunteers by the entities in question. But after scrutiny by the courts, but were deemed employees and were allowed to continue with their employment discrimination cases. Whatever position you currently hold – paid employee, volunteer, or intern – if you feel you are being harassed or discriminated against because of your age, race, religion, or gender, please contact a Kentucky employment attorney such as Steve Frederick to determine whether or not you have a claim.


Sources:

Sexual Harassment: Does It Matter if Accuser Is a Volunteer? hr.blr.com

Sixth Circuit Court Rules Definition of “Employee” Includes Some Volunteers, Extending Title VII Discrimination Protection; stockmarketsreview.com; October 22, 2011

Internships, Co-ops, and Volunteers; clark.edu; 2007

Bryson v Middlefield; leagle.com

Bookmark:      Bookmark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at del.icio.us      Digg Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at Digg.com      Bookmark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at Spurl.net      Bookmark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at Simpy.com      Bookmark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at NewsVine      Blink this Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at blinklist.com      Bookmark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at Furl.net      Bookmark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at reddit.com      Fark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at Fark.com      Bookmark Do%20Anti-Discrimination%20Laws%20Cover%20Interns%20and%20Volunteers%3F at Yahoo! MyWeb